Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix DQM/PhysicsHWW by just ignoring jets with invalid parameters (76x) #10941

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 28, 2015

Conversation

dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes (silences) exceptions in relvals for 76x.

https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/relval/3992.html
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/relval/3999.html

This module needs to be rewritten (or removed).
The code currently has no maintainer and it's in a pretty bad state.

In this particular case both hww.pfjets_p4 and hww.pfjets_JEC are filled
separately (and can have different sizes), even though
array index represents the same jet. This is definitely an error.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @dmitrijus (Dmitrijus) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

Fix DQM/PhysicsHWW by just ignoring jets with invalid parameters (76x)

It involves the following packages:

DQM/PhysicsHWW

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

Fixes (silences) exceptions in relvals for 76x. See diff.

This module needs to be rewritten (or removed).
The code currently has no maintainter and it's in a pretty bad state.

In this particular case both hww.pfjets_p4 and hww.pfjets_JEC are filled
separately (and can have different sizes), even though
array index represents the same jet. This is definetly an error.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #10941 was updated. @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please check and sign again.

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Aug 27, 2015

please test

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Aug 27, 2015

+1
provided it passes the tests

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2015
Fix DQM/PhysicsHWW by just ignoring jets with invalid parameters (76x)
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit e633077 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_6_X Aug 28, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants