Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GenPlusSimParticles_cfi.py. #11082

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 16, 2015
Merged

Conversation

wulsin
Copy link
Contributor

@wulsin wulsin commented Sep 2, 2015

Add customize configuration file to produce/keep a collection of particles simulated by GEANT combined with generated particles.

Wells Wulsin added 2 commits September 2, 2015 13:19
…icles simulated by GEANT combined with generated particles.
Add GenPlusSimParticles_cfi.py.
@wulsin
Copy link
Contributor Author

wulsin commented Sep 2, 2015

The motivation for this pull request is to be able to produce signal MC samples with central production, for the Run 2 Exotica search for disappearing tracks. Please let me know if I should additionally make a pull request to 7_6_X. I did the PR for 7_1_X because that is the release used for the Run II Winter 15 GEN-SIM campaign. Thanks!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2015

A new Pull Request was created by @wulsin (Wells Wulsin) for CMSSW_7_1_X.

Add GenPlusSimParticles_cfi.py.

It involves the following packages:

SimG4Core/CustomPhysics

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Sep 2, 2015

@wulsin , please, clone this PR to 7_6_X

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Sep 2, 2015

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2015

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2015

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Sep 2, 2015

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@wulsin
Copy link
Contributor Author

wulsin commented Sep 7, 2015

The motivation for using the GenPlusSimParticleProducer module for the simulation of exotic long-lived particles has been described in two presentations to the Simulation group:
4 Apr 2014: https://indico.cern.ch/event/310815/session/1/contribution/12/attachments/594838/818730/20140404_SimulationMtg.pdf
6 Mar 2015: https://indico.cern.ch/event/377207/session/0/contribution/6/attachments/752124/1031818/20150306_SIMExotica.pdf

@wulsin
Copy link
Contributor Author

wulsin commented Sep 8, 2015

Vladimir suggested that I specify the type of the collection produced by GenPlusSimParticleProducer, which is vector < reco::GenParticle > .

Also, the same PR for 7.6.X: #11083 has been merged.

Please let me know if any more information is needed.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2015
Add GenPlusSimParticles_cfi.py.
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 2fa3de9 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_1_X Sep 16, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants