Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CSC Beam Halo filter update #11266

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Sep 18, 2015
Merged

CSC Beam Halo filter update #11266

merged 4 commits into from Sep 18, 2015

Conversation

lathomas
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

This PR is a copy of the PR made for 74X and 75X:

#11136
#11137

-Pairs of segments in opposite endcaps are now matched with a dr/dz condition (rather than dr previously)
-The dphi condition to match segment has been tightened from 0.35 to 0.2.
-New flat CSC segment matching added (the old one remains the default for now): unvetoing CSC segments associated to tracker muons with pt < 3 gev
-Optional dt matching of opposite endcaps segments
-Testing a CSC segment/calorechit matching.
-Two new working points added in BeamHaloSummary.

The changes on the current filter only affect the counting of the flat segments, especially for opposite endcaps.

The current distribution of the two variables entering the current filter (longest chain of flat segments and opposite endcaps segments found) is shown on S15 here (left plots):
https://indico.cern.ch/event/438533/contribution/1/attachments/1139775/1632303/beamhalo.pdf

I have also added various methods to the CSCHaloData class. Two new filters were added to BeamHaloSummary but are not used anywhere so far. So all the changes, except the two mentioned above should not break anything and the size of the updated classes should not be dramatically modified.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @lathomas for CMSSW_7_6_X.

CSC Beam Halo filter update

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/METReco
RecoMET/METAlgorithms
RecoMET/METProducers

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @ahinzmann, @mmarionncern, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @mariadalfonso, @TaiSakuma this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1
Tested at: d04eea3
I found an error when building:

Copying tmp/slc6_amd64_gcc493/src/CondCore/Utilities/bin/conddb_test_gt_perf/conddb_test_gt_perf to productstore area:
Copying tmp/slc6_amd64_gcc493/src/CondCore/Utilities/bin/cmscond_export_database/cmscond_export_database to productstore area:
>> Building binary conddb_test
>> Building binary conddb_import
Copying tmp/slc6_amd64_gcc493/src/CondCore/Utilities/bin/cmscond_create_key/cmscond_create_key to productstore area:
error: class 'reco::CSCHaloData' has a different checksum for ClassVersion 10. Increment ClassVersion to 11 and assign it to checksum 1723373351
>> Building binary cmscond_encode_db_file
Suggestion: You can run 'scram build updateclassversion' to generate src/DataFormats/METReco/src/classes_def.xml.generated with updated ClassVersion
gmake: **\* [tmp/slc6_amd64_gcc493/src/DataFormats/METReco/src/DataFormatsMETReco/libDataFormatsMETRecoCapabilities.so] Error 1
>> Building binary conddb_copy_iov
Copying tmp/slc6_amd64_gcc493/src/CondCore/Utilities/bin/cmscond_export_iov/cmscond_export_iov to productstore area:


you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11266/8106/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
833f2d7
608fea7
0a6bc35
e3ad181
cdb5396
cdb62e7
6e3888f
c72f07d
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11266/8106/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11266/8106/git-merge-result

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #11266 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@lathomas
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have updated the request last night with the proper classes_def.xml definition, so you can rerun the test whenever you want ! It should hopefully work this time.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Sep 16, 2015

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

float jZ = jGlobalPosition.z() ;
float jT = jSegment->time();
// if(abs(jZ)<650&& TheEvent.id().run() < 251737)jT-= 25;
if (TMath::ACos(TMath::Cos(jPhi - iPhi)) <= 0.2//max_segment_phi_diff
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like you missed one of the unnecessary ACos(Cos()) cases.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yes... I will correct this but I first would like to make sure the compilation tests are ok.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #11266 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@lathomas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pull request updated (replacing acos(cos()) by deltaphi() )

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

For #11266 dce64eb

Small improvements to the CSC beam halo filter. #11136 and #11137 are the 74X and 75X versions of this PR, and they have already been approved by Reco.

The code changes are satisfactory, and Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-09-16-1200 show no significant differences. See #11136 for a performance summary that shows no significant change in timing with this PR.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2015
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 6a209c6 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_6_X Sep 18, 2015
@lathomas
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davidlange6 Can you also merge the PR for 74 and 75?
#11136
#11137
Thanks !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants