Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug in drawing DT simhits + improvements #1128

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 23, 2013

Conversation

namapane
Copy link
Contributor

The detid returned by the simhit is the wire ID, but the position is in the ref fame of the DTLayer. This was not taken into account so the simhits were drawn in random places. An example before the fix (green=simhits, blue=reconstructed segments):
vis_before_2

After the fix the simhits are correctly aligned:
vis_after_2

Also:
-Fix DT simhits in RhoZ view, so that they are displayed aligned to 1D rechits.
-Draw rechits associated to segments also in the 3D view.

…e wire ID, but the position is in the ref fame of the DTLayer. Fix DT simhits in RhoZ view, so that they are displayed aligned to 1D rechits. Draw rechits associated to segments also in the 3D view.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @namapane (Nicola Amapane) for CMSSW_7_0_X.

Fix bug in drawing DT simhits + improvements

It involves the following packages:

Fireworks/Muons
Fireworks/SimData

@smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @ktf, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alja this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@ktf you are the release manager for this.

@nclopezo
Copy link
Contributor

ktf added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2013
Fireworks fixes -- Fix bug in drawing DT simhits + improvements
@ktf ktf merged commit 3056ef6 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_0_X Oct 23, 2013
@alja
Copy link
Contributor

alja commented Oct 30, 2013

@namapane should I put this change in 6_X and 5_X releases too?

@namapane
Copy link
Contributor Author

For me it's fine to put it in 5X and 6X as well; if you do so, just keep
in mind that this is on top of pull req #1092.

Cheers
Nicola

On 30-Oct-13 18:16, Alja Mrak-Tadel wrote:

@namapane https://github.com/namapane should I put this change in 6_X
and 5_X releases too?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1128 (comment).

alja added a commit to alja/cmssw that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2013
alja added a commit to alja/cmssw that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2013
@namapane namapane deleted the VisMuonDT branch March 17, 2014 22:22
bundocka pushed a commit to bundocka/cmssw that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants