Fix in PF reconstruction for the spike at MET=0.0 - 75X version of #11280

[bachtis]

See detailed description in #11280

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bachtis (Michalis Bachtis) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Fix in PF reconstruction for the spike at MET=0.0 - 75X version of #11280

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducer
RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @lgray this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: e91e222
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11283/8127/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11283/8127/summary.html

[slava77]

+1

for #11283 e91e222

• changes are as in 76X
• jenkins tests pass and comparisons with baseline show the same pattern as in Fix in PF reconstruction for the spike at MET=0.0 - 76X version  #11284 (only wf 4.53 has a single event diff in pf candidates, which propagates downstream in fwlite plots, the DQM comparisons as a result are made with a higher diff threshold and no differences appear there)
• more details are in Fix in PF reconstruction for the spike at MET=0.0 - 76X version  #11284 thread

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1

On Sep 18, 2015, at 2:42 PM, cmsbuild <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6https://github.com/davidlange6, @deganohttps://github.com/degano, @smuzaffarhttps://github.com/smuzaffar

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/11283#issuecomment-141440731.