Update Higgs Dalitz paths (74X)

[jasperlauwers]

backport of #11340

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @jasperlauwers for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Update Higgs Dalitz paths (74X)

It involves the following packages:

HLTriggerOffline/Higgs

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @broen, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[perrotta]

@jasperlauwers : only the last commit in this ticket is actually the backport of #11340.
Could you please make separate pull requests for separate updates/fixes?
As such you would speed up the merging of the part which relates to the additional monitoring of the new Dalitz path(s), and as a consequence the integration of the new paths in the HLT menu.

[deguio]

please test

[deguio]

@davidlange6 should comment about policies, but decoupling the two set of changes should speed up the integration.

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 0658cd0
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11344/8289/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11344/8289/summary.html

[jasperlauwers]

All commits before the last one are in #11209
I'm a bit lost in what exactly you want me to do. Also because #11209 contains a new path (HLT_Ele23_WPLoose_Gsf_WHbbBoost_v1) that didn't need to be fully merged in 75x and 74x to get the green light from STEAM.
Could you please clearify if you want me to rebase #11209 on top of the new commit in this PR so this commit can be merged faster?

[perrotta]

@jasperlauwers : we already decided to include the new paths even if these 74X/75X PR's could not be fully signed yet, because the DQM update requested (included in your last commit) is trivial, and already merged in 76X. Therefore, do whatever you prefer with these backport PR's (provided you keep taking care of them whenever needed).

Anyhow, I think that n principle you should have rather had to backport one PR at a time instead of mixing all them together, especially if the easy one is requested for the integration of the new paths in the HLT menu, and it can be stopped by the toughest part of the cumulative PR.

(Please, contact me privately if you want to continue this discussion. Or join us tomorrow at the TSG meeting)

[deguio]

+1
I would have created a PR containing only the last commit so that the cfg path update can be merged faster, but fine. approving this one.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #11344 was updated. @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please check and sign again.

[deguio]

please test

[deguio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/8749/console

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs after it passes the integration tests and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 1c5874c
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11344/8749/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11344/8749/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[jasperlauwers]

The commits in this PR have been validated in 7_6_0_pre6. Can it be merged?

[davidlange6]

+1