4-lines constexpr omission fix (75X)

[abdoulline]

complementary to PR#11101

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @abdoulline (Salavat Abdullin) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

4-lines constexpr omission fix

It involves the following packages:

RecoLocalCalo/HcalRecAlgos

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[slava77]

@abdoulline please make one for 76X as well
(ideally, the same abdoulline:HcalRecAlgos_fix75X should work, but with recent changes in HCAL code, I wouldn't be so sure. If it doesn't, then a separate branch with respect to 76X will be needed)
Thank you.

[slava77]

ok, I noticed #11377

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 10b1d1b
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11376/8220/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11376/8220/summary.html

[slava77]

+1

for #11376 10b1d1b

• symbols added to .cc file as expected
• jenkins tests pass (compilation was enough), comparisons with baseline show no differences

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1