RazorHbb HLT DQM for 76X

[jmduarte]

Changes for Razor Hbb HLT DQM for 76X

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @jmduarte (Javier Duarte) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

RazorHbb HLT DQM for 76X

It involves the following packages:

HLTriggerOffline/SUSYBSM

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #11644 was updated. @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please check and sign again.

[deguio]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

-1

Tested at: a4e645a
I found errors in the following addon tests:

cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:50nsGRun,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_data_50nsGRun --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --customise=SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration/postLS1Customs.customisePostLS1_50ns --magField 38T_PostLS1 --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_50nsGRun_DATA.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_50nsGRun_DATA_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Wed Oct 7 11:52:00 2015-date Wed Oct 7 11:44:57 2015 s - exit: 16640
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:PIon,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_data_PIon --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --customise=SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration/postLS1Customs.customisePostLS1 --magField 38T_PostLS1 --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_PIon_DATA.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_PIon_DATA_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Wed Oct 7 12:03:37 2015-date Wed Oct 7 11:59:40 2015 s - exit: 16640
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:GRun,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_data_GRun --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --customise=SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration/postLS1Customs.customisePostLS1 --magField 38T_PostLS1 --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_GRun_DATA.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_GRun_DATA_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Wed Oct 7 12:13:03 2015-date Wed Oct 7 12:06:38 2015 s - exit: 16640

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11644/8660/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11644/8660/summary.html

[jmduarte]

Hi all,

I've looked at the logs from the failed tests and I only see the exception:

----- Begin Fatal Exception 07-Oct-2015 12:12:44 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'FormulaEvaluatorParseError' occurred while
   [0] Processing run: 191718 lumi: 109 event: 128717928
   [1] Running path 'reconstruction_step'
   [2] Calling event method for module LXXXCorrectorProducer/'ak4PFCHSResidualCorrector'
Exception Message:
While parsing '[2]*([3]+[4]*TMath::Log(max([0],min([1],x))))*1./([5]+[6]*100./3.*(TMath::Max(0.,1.03091-0.051154*pow(x,-0.154227))-TMath::Max(0.,1.03091-0.051154*TMath::Power(208.,-0.154227)))+[7]*((-2.36997+0.413917*TMath::Log(x))/x-(-2.36997+0.413917*TMath::Log(208))/208))' could not parse beyond '[2]*([3]+[4]*'
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

which doesn't seem to have anything to do with this PR

[deguio]

please test

[deguio]

+1
provided it passes the tests

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/8816/console

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

-1
Tested at: a4e645a
you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11644/8816/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[smuzaffar]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/8876/console

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: a4e645a
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11644/8876/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11644/8876/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1