Heavy ion common alignment producer 76 x

[jrcastle]

This pull request includes the addition of several new common alignment AlCaReco producers that will be used on heavy ion data. Additional files edited include these producers into AlCa streams.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @jrcastle (James Castle) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

Heavy ion common alignment producer 76 x

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/CommonAlignmentProducer
Configuration/EventContent
Configuration/StandardSequences
DQMOffline/Alignment

@diguida, @danduggan, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @deguio, @mmusich, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @pakhotin, @frmeier, @makortel, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @tlampen, @mschrode, @cerati, @mmusich, @dgulhan, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[mmusich]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/8707/console

[cmsbuild]

-1

Tested at: f373919
I found errors in the following addon tests:

cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:50nsGRun,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_data_50nsGRun --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --customise=SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration/postLS1Customs.customisePostLS1_50ns --magField 38T_PostLS1 --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_50nsGRun_DATA.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_50nsGRun_DATA_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Oct 8 20:45:41 2015-date Thu Oct 8 20:41:28 2015 s - exit: 16640
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:PIon,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_data_PIon --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --customise=SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration/postLS1Customs.customisePostLS1 --magField 38T_PostLS1 --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_PIon_DATA.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_PIon_DATA_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Oct 8 20:54:27 2015-date Thu Oct 8 20:51:30 2015 s - exit: 16640
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:GRun,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_data_GRun --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --customise=SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration/postLS1Customs.customisePostLS1 --magField 38T_PostLS1 --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_GRun_DATA.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_GRun_DATA_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Oct 8 21:00:33 2015-date Thu Oct 8 20:56:16 2015 s - exit: 16640

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11698/8707/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #11698 was updated. @diguida, @danduggan, @boudoul, @franzoni, @cerminar, @fabozzi, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @deguio, @mmusich, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9333/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 143479d
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11698/9333/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11698/9333/summary.html

[fabozzi]

+1

[mmusich]

+1

[mmusich]

@deguio @vanbesien can you please check and sign again?

[deguio]

+1

[boudoul]

Hi @jrcastle , all, I guess that this should also go to 75X since we will reconstruct HI data in 75X , any though on this?

[mmusich]

@boudoul of course it is. And indeed it is in #12030 now suprerseded by #12213 (as just discussed at the ORP). Hope this helps.

[boudoul]

oh ok, was lost between closed, superseeding PRs etc... , perfect, thanks

[mmusich]

@boudoul this happened because adding the new producers in the relval matrix required changing the AlCaReco Trigger bits in Global Tag thefore the changes are coupled.

[davidlange6]

@mmusich - sorry I didn't notice during the ORP- being a new alca producer this is needed only for 80x at this point I think

[mmusich]

@davidlange6 that's fine, there is no real use case for it in 76X

[davidlange6]

I am cleaning up the 76x queue aside from things for analysis workflows. I'm closing this pull request, please make sure the PR is in 80x. Thanks!