Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CondFormats/Common: remove intrusive macros breaking libstdc++ #12091

Merged

Conversation

davidlt
Copy link
Contributor

@davidlt davidlt commented Oct 26, 2015

We cannot redefine 'private' and 'protected' keywords via macros to e.g.
'public'. This is extremely intrusive and breaks encapsulation.

This does not work anymore with new libstdc++ libraries, because foward
delcaration of struct is implicitly private and then implementation is
under explicit private clause. Redefining 'private' only change one of
them thus creating compile-time errors in sstream.

Details in PR65899 (GCC BZ). It's WONTFIX.

Such cleanups are required for GCC 5 and above.

Signed-off-by: David Abdurachmanov David.Abdurachmanov@cern.ch

We cannot redefine 'private' and 'protected' keywords via macros to e.g.
'public'. This is extremely intrusive and breaks encapsulation.

This does not work anymore with new libstdc++ libraries, because foward
delcaration of struct is implicitly private and then implementation is
under explicit private clause. Redefining 'private' only change one of
them thus creating compile-time errors in sstream.

Details in PR65899 (GCC BZ). It's WONTFIX.

Such cleanups are required for GCC 5 and above.

Signed-off-by: David Abdurachmanov <David.Abdurachmanov@cern.ch>
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @davidlt for CMSSW_8_0_X.

CondFormats/Common: remove intrusive macros breaking libstdc++

It involves the following packages:

CondFormats/Common

@diguida, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @ggovi, @mmusich can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@apfeiffer1 this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@davidlt
Copy link
Contributor Author

davidlt commented Oct 29, 2015

@diguida @ggovi @davidlange6 could we get this one it? It is waiting for <2 weeks and this the last non-Fireworks piece.

@davidlt
Copy link
Contributor Author

davidlt commented Nov 3, 2015

ping^1

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2015
CondFormats/Common: remove intrusive macros breaking libstdc++
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 7a4c317 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_0_X Nov 5, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants