CalibCalorimetry/EcalLaserAnalyzer: disable object I/O (ClassDef)

[davidlt]

Having classes based on TObject without ClassDef creates issues while
creating a dictionary. According to CVS these files were introduced 6
years and 4 months ago and already had ClassDef commented out.
ClassVersionID is set to 0 because I/O is not needed for these
control classes.

CVS history:http://cvs.web.cern.ch/cvs/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/CMSSW/CalibCalorimetry/EcalLaserAnalyzer/interface/
ROOT ClassDef documentation: https://root.cern.ch/root/Using.html

Signed-off-by: David Abdurachmanov David.Abdurachmanov@cern.ch

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @davidlt for CMSSW_7_6_X.

CalibCalorimetry/EcalLaserAnalyzer: disable object I/O (ClassDef)

It involves the following packages:

CalibCalorimetry/EcalLaserAnalyzer

@cmsbuild, @mmusich, @diguida, @franzoni, @cerminar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[diguida]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9237/console

[diguida]

+1
back-port of #12115

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: c36f522
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12121/9237/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
5ef930d
b7e3fe8
6895a28
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12121/9237/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12121/9237/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1