save particleFlowRecHitHBHE and particleFlowRecHitHF collections

[kpedro88]

Backport of #12300 for 76X

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

save particleFlowRecHitHBHE and particleFlowRecHitHF collections

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/Configuration

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @bachtis, @lgray this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' or '@cmsbuild, please test' 'please test with cms-sw/cmsdist#PR' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cvuosalo]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9546/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: b6ae995
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12324/9546/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12324/9546/summary.html

[cvuosalo]

+1

For #12324 b6ae995

Replacing the particleFlowRecHitHCAL collection with the particleFlowRecHitHBHE and particleFlowRecHitHF collections. There should be no change in monitored quantities. #12300 and #12325 are the 80X and 75X versions of this PR, and the latter has already been approved by Reco.

Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-11-09-1100 show no significant differences, as expected. Extended tests done for #12300 also show no significant differences and an only very marginal increase in product sizes

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1