New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changed the Hadronizer and scripts to work with Sherpa 2.2.0 #12462
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @thuer (Sebastian Thüer) for CMSSW_8_0_X. It involves the following packages: GeneratorInterface/SherpaInterface @vciulli, @covarell, @thuer, @cmsbuild, @bendavid, @davidlange6, @govoni can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. Following commands in first line of a comment are recognized
|
Yes, sorry, we missed re-signing that one after the last update. Please include those commits here (since they are no longer needed in 76x) |
…he previously used Frontier Client method
…f partial pathes are used
Sorry for the many small commits, they were already in the previous pull request and it was easier to just cherry pick them |
+1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar |
+1 |
Changed the Hadronizer and scripts to work with Sherpa 2.2.0
Changed the Interface and Scripts to work with Sherpa 2.2.0
The changes to the Sherpack retrieving method (from frontier to normal cp) #11985 are not yet merged, should I cherry-pick the commits to this pull request and update the RelVal fragments?