Add HIZeroBias Trigger in Strip DQM

[fioriNTU]

No description provided.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @fioriNTU for CMSSW_7_5_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/SiStripMonitorClient

@cmsbuild, @vanbesien, @deguio, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

Following commands in first line of a comment are recognized

• +1|approve[d]|sign[ed]: L1/L2's to approve it
• -1|reject[ed]: L1/L2's to reject it
• assign <category>[,<category>[,...]]: L1/L2's to request signatures from other categories
• unassign <category>[,<category>[,...]]: L1/L2's to remove signatures from other categories
• hold: L1/all L2's/release manager to mark it as on hold
• unhold: L1/user who put this PR on hold
• merge: L1/release managers to merge this request
• [@cmsbuild,] please test: L1/L2 and selected users to start jenkins tests
• [@cmsbuild,] please test with cms-sw/cmsdist#<PR>: L1/L2 and selected users to start jenkins tests using externals from cmsdist

[fioriNTU]

@davidlange6 it would be great to have this merged in a coming patch release for HI, if possible

[fioriNTU]

@deguio @davidlange6 @slava77 sorry to insist, but this is a very basic fix, not touching any c++ code and it will cure the unreasonable high number of reconstructed tracks that show up in Offline DQM plots. Please let me know if it can be merged before HI collisions are over

[davidlange6]

@deguio (and most others) typically gets to things quickly but not always within 1 working day.

On Dec 2, 2015, at 2:06 PM, fioriNTU notifications@github.com wrote:

@deguio @davidlange6 @slava77 sorry to insist, but this is a very basic fix, not touching any c++ code and it will cure the unreasonable high number of reconstructed tracks that show up in Offline DQM plots. Please let me know if it can be merged before HI collisions are over

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test
could help to get things moving

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/10083/console

[deguio]

+1
in a period during which we receive only urgent request, the urgency mode is the new normality.
don't be surprised if this or some other urgent PR miss the release
cheers,
F.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs after it passes the integration tests and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 4038bc2
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12623/10083/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12623/10083/summary.html

[davidlange6]

+1