Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing AlCa Matrix for 2015 EOY Reprocessing #12716

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 9, 2015

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Dec 8, 2015

Fixing AlCa Matrix for the EOY 2015 reprocessing.
As in: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/AlCaRecoMatrix#25_ns_7e33_collisions_13_TeV

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Dec 8, 2015

please test

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_7_6_X milestone Dec 8, 2015
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 8, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/10201/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 8, 2015

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/AlCa

@diguida, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

Following commands in first line of a comment are recognized

  • +1|approve[d]|sign[ed]: L1/L2's to approve it
  • -1|reject[ed]: L1/L2's to reject it
  • assign <category>[,<category>[,...]]: L1/L2's to request signatures from other categories
  • unassign <category>[,<category>[,...]]: L1/L2's to remove signatures from other categories
  • hold: L1/all L2's/release manager to mark it as on hold
  • unhold: L1/user who put this PR on hold
  • merge: L1/release managers to merge this request
  • [@cmsbuild,] please test: L1/L2 and selected users to start jenkins tests
  • [@cmsbuild,] please test with cms-sw/cmsdist#<PR>: L1/L2 and selected users to start jenkins tests using externals from cmsdist

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 8, 2015

-1
Tested at: 76cfccc
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
1000.0 step2

runTheMatrix-results/1000.0_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0+SKIMD+HARVESTDfst2+ALCASPLIT/step2_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0+SKIMD+HARVESTDfst2+ALCASPLIT.log

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12716/10201/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 9, 2015

Pull request #12716 was updated. @diguida, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Dec 9, 2015

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 9, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/10206/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 9, 2015

-1
Tested at: a597e95
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
1000.0 step2

runTheMatrix-results/1000.0_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0+SKIMD+HARVESTDfst2+ALCASPLIT/step2_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0+SKIMD+HARVESTDfst2+ALCASPLIT.log
----- Begin Fatal Exception 09-Dec-2015 09:54:19 CET-----------------------
An exception of category 'Configuration' occurred while
   [0] Processing run: 165121 lumi: 62 event: 23609118
   [1] Running path 'pathALCARECOHcalCalIterativePhiSym'
   [2] Calling event method for module HLTHighLevel/'hcalphisymHLT'
Exception Message:
 HLTHighLevel [instance: hcalphisymHLT - path: pathALCARECOHcalCalIterativePhiSym]: No triggerList with key HcalCalIterativePhiSym in AlCaRecoTriggerBitsRcd
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12716/10206/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 9, 2015

Pull request #12716 was updated. @diguida, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Dec 9, 2015

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 9, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/10209/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 9, 2015

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Dec 9, 2015

+1
few AlCaReco streams for Prompt had to be removed due to missing AlCaRecoTriggerBit in the run used for RelVal tests. Complete set + new Global Tag will be proposed for 8.0.X.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 9, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 9, 2015

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2015
Fixing AlCa Matrix for 2015 EOY Reprocessing
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 01f21df into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_6_X Dec 9, 2015
@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@davidlange6 , should we revert it for 80X?

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Dec 10, 2015

@smuzaffar yes please, I need in any case to modify it for 80X

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

looks like we should unless @mmusich has a quick comment? Its not really clear to me what went wrong.

On Dec 10, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Malik Shahzad Muzaffar notifications@github.com wrote:

@davidlange6 , should we revert it for 80X?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Dec 10, 2015

@davidlange6 at the moment is not clear to me either. I need anyway to introduce more changes for 80X so please revert it.

This was referenced Dec 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants