new miniAOD-only workflows for miniAOD validation

[hengne]

1.) Add miniAOD-only relval workflows running only the miniAOD+DQM step (also harvest step) using previous RECO/AOD as input.
2.) For all major Run2 fullSim noPU, PU, and 2015 data workflows, the corresponding miniAOD-only workflows are created.
3.) For 2015 data miniAOD-only workflows, add some protections in the customization functions. Those customization functions try to modify some parameters that not used and do not exist in the miniAOD only configuration file, so without a protection to check the existence of the parameters, the workflows will fail to run.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @hengne (Hengne Li) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/DataProcessing
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation
SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration

@civanch, @boudoul, @franzoni, @mdhildreth, @fabozzi, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @hengne, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @makortel, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

Following commands in first line of a comment are recognized

• +1|approve[d]|sign[ed]: L1/L2's to approve it
• -1|reject[ed]: L1/L2's to reject it
• assign <category>[,<category>[,...]]: L1/L2's to request signatures from other categories
• unassign <category>[,<category>[,...]]: L1/L2's to remove signatures from other categories
• hold: L1/all L2's/release manager to mark it as on hold
• unhold: L1/user who put this PR on hold
• merge: L1/release managers to merge this request
• [@cmsbuild,] please test: L1/L2 and selected users to start jenkins tests
• [@cmsbuild,] please test with cms-sw/cmsdist#<PR>: L1/L2 and selected users to start jenkins tests using externals from cmsdist

[hengne]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/10210/console

[cmsbuild]

-1
Tested at: 4e77bf5
you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12720/10210/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
4e77bf5
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12720/10210/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12720/10210/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #12720 was updated. @boudoul, @franzoni, @fabozzi, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @hengne, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[hengne]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/10255/console

[fabozzi]

@hengne
I agree with your plan to restore autoCond GT in 80X

[cmsbuild]

-1
Tested at: 57041c8
The relvals timed out after 2 hours.

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12720/10255/summary.html

[hengne]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/10270/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 57041c8
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12720/10270/summary.html

[srimanob]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12720/10270/summary.html