New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HLTHiggsSubAnalysis: read within bounds #12849
HLTHiggsSubAnalysis: read within bounds #12849
Conversation
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @slava77 (Slava Krutelyov) for CMSSW_8_0_X. It involves the following packages: HLTriggerOffline/Higgs @cmsbuild, @vanbesien, @deguio, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. Following commands in first line of a comment are recognized
|
-1 runTheMatrix-results/134.911_RunSinglePh2015D+RunSinglePh2015D+HLTDR2_25ns+RECODR2_25nsreHLT+HARVESTDR2_25nsreHLT/step3_RunSinglePh2015D+RunSinglePh2015D+HLTDR2_25ns+RECODR2_25nsreHLT+HARVESTDR2_25nsreHLT.log 1001.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/1001.0_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0EXP+ALCAEXP+ALCAHARVD1+ALCAHARVD2+ALCAHARVD3+ALCAHARVD4/step3_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0EXP+ALCAEXP+ALCAHARVD1+ALCAHARVD2+ALCAHARVD3+ALCAHARVD4.log you can see the results of the tests here: |
@cmsbuild please test |
jenkins tests show no differences in comparisons (workflows where I've seen random differences before are not in the comparisons: it usually happens in high pt muon guns) |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar |
…adReads HLTHiggsSubAnalysis: read within bounds
add range check in jet flag calculation to avoid reads out of bounds.
This fixes occasional "random" differences in Higgs/VBFHToInv