Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bsunanda:Phase2-gem13 Correct forward muon part for 3 2023 scenario #13916

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 6, 2016

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda bsunanda commented Apr 4, 2016

No description provided.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_8_1_X milestone Apr 4, 2016
@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Apr 4, 2016

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2016

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

Geometry/CMSCommonData

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/12161/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2016

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2016

@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@
'Geometry/MuonCommonData/data/v7/gem21.xml',
'Geometry/MuonCommonData/data/v2/csc.xml',
'Geometry/MuonCommonData/data/PhaseII/mfshield.xml',
'Geometry/MuonCommonData/data/PhaseII/me0.xml',
'Geometry/MuonCommonData/data/v8/me0.xml',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bsunanda - one may assume that if me0 is defined in v8, gem should also come from v8. Is there any reason to keep PhaseII/me0? Perhaps, replacing it with v8 would be better? Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ianna - v8 does not exist for ge11, v7 is the final geometry for it. for ge21, v8 is only a temporary geometry we need for our studies, while v7 is the baseline, so it is better to go with v7 for the moment. when we have the final geometry for ge21 we will move to that. for me0, instead, v8 is an already improved version wrt the one present in the PhaseII folder. After this PR we will clean up a bit the old geometries, and organize the remaining files in folders with more explanatory names.

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Apr 6, 2016

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 6, 2016

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 8b9cf11 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Apr 6, 2016
@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Apr 8, 2016

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 8, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/12255/console

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Apr 8, 2016

@davidlange6 I tried to correct the files but I do not see the changes get updated. Is it because of the status?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 8, 2016

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

this pr was merged already, so you need to make a new one instead of updating this one

On Apr 8, 2016, at 5:54 PM, bsunanda notifications@github.com wrote:

@davidlange6 I tried to correct the files but I do not see the changes get updated. Is it because of the status?


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 8, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants