Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix problem with FH hits not getting correct dE/dX normalizations. #14932

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 22, 2016

Conversation

lgray
Copy link
Contributor

@lgray lgray commented Jun 21, 2016

Layer number was resetting for FH layers, requires offset.

@lgray
Copy link
Contributor Author

lgray commented Jun 21, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 21, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13603/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @lgray (Lindsey Gray) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoLocalCalo/HGCalRecAlgos

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@vandreev11, @sethzenz, @kpedro88, @argiro, @cseez, @pfs this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 4bb8f05

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14932/13603/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: UnitTests

  • Unit Tests:

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test runtestRecoLocalCaloHGCalRecProducers had ERRORS

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 21, 2016

+1

for #14932 4bb8f05

  • code change is as described, affects only 2023 workflows with HGCAL
  • jenkins tests pass (2023 workflows are not a part of comparisons)
  • locally tested with 11024 and 11021: HGC HEF hit energies change and now on the extreme high side look like normal response.
    Here is a plot from 11024 (ttbar)
    all_sign730vsorig_ttbar13tev2023wf11024p0c_log10hgcrechitssorted_hgcalrechit_hgchefrechits_reco_obj_obj_energy

@lgray is the population at the very low end after some reasonable zero suppression?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@lgray
Copy link
Contributor Author

lgray commented Jun 21, 2016

@slava77 The population at the low end is cutting at 2 x noise x thickness, so a reasonable zero suppression, except for the 100um thick sensors where you start to eat a bit of the noise since you're only two sigma out. It is under discussion if we are going to make this cut harder.

@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 1f637d2 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Jun 22, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants