Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new ParticleGun-RandomtXiGunProducer for CTPPS #15096

Merged

Conversation

sandrofonseca
Copy link
Contributor

@covarell @govoni

Hi Roberto and Pietro
We are opening a PR for RandomtXiProducer which was used in the publication of the CTPPS TDR.

Below, you can find some cmsDriver commands as one example to use it.

cmsDriver.py SingleProton_RandomtXiGunProducer_cfi.py --mc --eventcontent FEVTDEBUG --datatier GEN-SIM --conditions 80X_mcRun2_asymptotic_2016_v2 --step GEN,SIM --era Run2_25ns --processName=CTPPS -n 2 --no_exec

Let us know your opnion about this PR

Thanks in advance,
Sandro

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2016

A new Pull Request was created by @sandrofonseca (Sandro Fonseca de Souza) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Generator
IOMC/ParticleGuns

@covarell, @perrozzi, @thuer, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @govoni can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@perrozzi
Copy link
Contributor

@sandrofonseca: any follow up on this? is it still relevant?

@sandrofonseca
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @perrozzi
Yes, it is relevant for the CTPPS offline simulation which is in development. I am waiting any feedback about it of the @covarell @govoni .

@perrozzi
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 25, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/14727/console

@perrozzi
Copy link
Contributor

@sandrofonseca in the meanwhile I trigger the tests, we will finish reviewing the PR int he meanwhile
for the final sign off

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@perrozzi
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@sandrofonseca
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dear Experts,
I would like to know when this PR will be discussed in the ORP meeting. Thus, it can merge in the next CMSSW_8_1_X release. Please, can you clarify it for me?
@perrozzi
@slava77 @davidlange6 @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit f07cdcd into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Sep 21, 2016
@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

This no longer compiles because of #15897

// to keep the EventContent definitions happy
// later on we might put the info into the run info that this is a PGun
auto_ptr<GenRunInfoProduct> genRunInfo( new GenRunInfoProduct() );
run.put( genRunInfo );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These two lines won't compile anymore. They need to be changed to

run.put( std::make_unique<GenRunInfoProduct>() );

smuzaffar added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2016
@jan-kaspar jan-kaspar deleted the integration-IOMC/RandomtxiProducer branch December 4, 2020 11:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants