Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MC updates for trancheIV #15432

Merged

Conversation

franzoni
Copy link

@franzoni franzoni commented Aug 11, 2016

see: https://indico.cern.ch/event/562065/cntributions/2270369/

Summary of changes in Global Tags

RunII simulation

  • RunII Ideal scenario : 81X_mcRun2_design_v5 as 81X_mcRun2_design_v4 with the following changes:
    • updated SiPixel dynamic inefficiency for 2016 data (high PU)
  • RunII CRAFT scenario : 81X_mcRun2cosmics_startup_peak_v5 as 81X_mcRun2cosmics_startup_peak_v4 with the following changes:
    • updated EcalChannelStatus (as in Aug 2016)
    • updated RPC noise and efficiency
    • updated SiPixel dynamic inefficiency for 2016 data (high PU)
    • updated Pixel channel status (as in Aug 2016)
    • updated Strip channel status (as in Aug 2016)
  • RunII Asymptotic scenario : 81X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v5 as 81X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v4 with the following changes:
    • updated EcalChannelStatus (as in Aug 2016)
    • updated RPC noise and efficiency
    • updated SiPixel dynamic inefficiency for 2016 data (high PU)
    • updated Pixel channel status (as in Aug 2016)
    • updated Strip channel status (as in Aug 2016)
    • updated Tracker Alignment fixing z-shrinkage effect
  • RunII Startup scenario : 81X_mcRun2_startup_v5 as 81X_mcRun2_startup_v4 with the following changes:
    • updated EcalChannelStatus (as in Aug 2016)
    • updated RPC noise and efficiency
    • updated SiPixel dynamic inefficiency for 2016 data (high PU)
    • updated Pixel channel status (as in Aug 2016)
    • updated Strip channel status (as in Aug 2016)
  • RunII Heavy Ions scenario : 81X_mcRun2_HeavyIon_v5 as 81X_mcRun2_HeavyIon_v3 with the following changes:
    • updated EcalChannelStatus (as in Aug 2016)
    • updated RPC noise and efficiency
    • updated SiPixel dynamic inefficiency for 2016 data (high PU)
    • updated Pixel channel status (as in Aug 2016)
    • updated Strip channel status (as in Aug 2016)
    • updated Tracker Alignment fixing z-shrinkage effect

Upgrade

@franzoni
Copy link
Author

please test

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_8_1_X milestone Aug 11, 2016
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 11, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/14477/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @franzoni (Giovanni Franzoni) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/AlCa

@ghellwig, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald, @ghellwig, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Aug 11, 2016

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 11, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/14480/console

@franzoni franzoni changed the title MC updates for tranceIV MC updates for trancheIV Aug 11, 2016
@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Aug 11, 2016

@davidlange6 this is the whole package of updates for the Tranche-IV MC.
Given the production is going to happen in 80X, are we allowed to backport the same updates in the 80X GTs, even if this changes the physics performance?
Thanks for input,
Marco & Giovanni

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

On Aug 11, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Marco Musich <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

@davidlange6https://github.com/davidlange6 this is the whole package of updates for the Tranche-IV MC.
Given the production is going to happen in 80X, are we allowed to backport the same updates in the 80X GTs, even if this changes the physics performance?

we will do something coherent with the N other changes being discussed, yes. no harm in making a PR as to be prepared.

Thanks for input,
Marco & Giovanni


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/15432#issuecomment-239192817, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEzyw-R2YLbzW0_Ecy3G3eTaKQrnCWA8ks5qezy9gaJpZM4JiM98.

@franzoni
Copy link
Author

ok, will go that way.

@franzoni
Copy link
Author

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 6a25e88 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Aug 12, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants