Run2-TB13 Provide test beam simulation with beam spread

[bsunanda]

No description provided.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

IOMC/ParticleGuns
SimG4CMS/HGCalTestBeam

@civanch, @perrozzi, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @thuer, @govoni, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15369/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 48ca91f
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-15975/15369/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-15975/15369/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• 10424.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017NewFPix_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017NewFPix+RecoFull_2017NewFPix+HARVESTFull_2017NewFPix
• 10624.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017HCALdev_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017HCALdev+RecoFull_2017HCALdev+HARVESTFull_2017HCALdev
• 10824.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017AllNew_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017AllNew+RecoFull_2017AllNew+HARVESTFull_2017AllNew

[civanch]

@bsunanda , in the new Producer lines 45-48 are useless, even if they protected via ifdef. After first check these lines may be safely removed.

[perrozzi]

hi, does this need to be approved by GEN?

[civanch]

+1

[bsunanda]

@perrozzi Kindly review and approve this?

[davidlange6]

Hi @perrozzi - yes it does.

[perrozzi]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1