New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
new plots for tracking DQM 81x #16013
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @mtosi (mia tosi) for CMSSW_8_1_X. It involves the following packages: DQM/TrackingMonitor @cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are list here #13028 |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 Adding new tracking DQM plots. There should be no change in monitored RECO quantities. #16014 is the 80X version of this PR, and it has already been approved by Reco. The code changes are satisfactory, and Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_8_1_X_2016-09-28-1100 show the new DQM plots and no other significant differences, as expected. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both of my comments can be addressed later. In addition, I think it would be good to make corresponding changes for stop reason names to TrackBuildingAnalyzer.
<< ". Please update also TrackAnalyzer.cc near line " << __LINE__ << "."; | ||
<< " but StopReasonName's only for " | ||
<< StopReasonNameSize | ||
<< ". Please update DataFormats/TrackReco/interface/TrajectoryStopReasons.h."; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This check would be better implemented as a static_assert
in DataFormats/TrackReco/interface/TrajectoryStopReasons.h
"MAX_CCC_LOST_HITS", // 8 | ||
"NO_SEGMENTS_FOR_VALID_LAYERS", // 9 | ||
"SEED_EXTENSION", // 10 | ||
"NOT_STOPPED" // 11 (be careful ...) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you improve the comment (essentially that NOT_STOPPED
needs to be the last, and that it's index differs from the enumeration value)? I had to think a bit again what was going on :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks @makortel,
I think I've just addressed both comments, but the one on the static_assert
Pull request #16013 was updated. @cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
as suggested by matti
abdf793
to
3011d87
Compare
Pull request #16013 was updated. @cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild , please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
+1 |
as requested by tracking POG,
some new plots have been added to the tracking DQM
in addition, I fix the track stopping source name by adding a dedicated list of strings