Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new plots for tracking DQM 81x #16013

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Sep 30, 2016
Merged

Conversation

mtosi
Copy link
Contributor

@mtosi mtosi commented Sep 28, 2016

as requested by tracking POG,
some new plots have been added to the tracking DQM

in addition, I fix the track stopping source name by adding a dedicated list of strings

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mtosi (mia tosi) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/TrackingMonitor
DQM/TrackingMonitorSource
DataFormats/TrackReco

@cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@hdelanno, @makortel, @VinInn, @fioriNTU, @gpetruc, @idebruyn, @threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@mtosi
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtosi commented Sep 28, 2016

@dmitrijus @rovere @VinInn

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 28, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15418/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

For #16013 58348f5

Adding new tracking DQM plots. There should be no change in monitored RECO quantities.

#16014 is the 80X version of this PR, and it has already been approved by Reco.

The code changes are satisfactory, and Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_8_1_X_2016-09-28-1100 show the new DQM plots and no other significant differences, as expected.

Copy link
Contributor

@makortel makortel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both of my comments can be addressed later. In addition, I think it would be good to make corresponding changes for stop reason names to TrackBuildingAnalyzer.

<< ". Please update also TrackAnalyzer.cc near line " << __LINE__ << ".";
<< " but StopReasonName's only for "
<< StopReasonNameSize
<< ". Please update DataFormats/TrackReco/interface/TrajectoryStopReasons.h.";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This check would be better implemented as a static_assert in DataFormats/TrackReco/interface/TrajectoryStopReasons.h

"MAX_CCC_LOST_HITS", // 8
"NO_SEGMENTS_FOR_VALID_LAYERS", // 9
"SEED_EXTENSION", // 10
"NOT_STOPPED" // 11 (be careful ...)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you improve the comment (essentially that NOT_STOPPED needs to be the last, and that it's index differs from the enumeration value)? I had to think a bit again what was going on :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @makortel,
I think I've just addressed both comments, but the one on the static_assert

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #16013 was updated. @cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #16013 was updated. @cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@VinInn
Copy link
Contributor

VinInn commented Sep 29, 2016

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 29, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15437/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

For #16013 3011d87

Second approval, after minor code changes. The new code is satisfactory, and the new Jenkins results show no problems, just the new DQM plots, as expected.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 3120cfb into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Sep 30, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants