Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changes to HLT online DQM monitoring code for HI run in 81X #16346

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 31, 2016

Conversation

varuns23
Copy link
Contributor

The PR is made using CMSSW_8_1_X_2016-10-25-1100

@mtosi @vanbesien @diguida @dmitrijus @silviodonato

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @varuns23 (varun sharma) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/HLTEvF
DQM/Integration

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @silviodonato, @dmitrijus, @Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzard, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @batinkov this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@stahlleiton
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @varuns23 , could you also add the dimuon mass plots for L1/L2/L3 PADoubleMuon10, included in the following 81X PR #15759 for pPb. Thanks!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #16346 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @silviodonato, @dmitrijus, @Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzard, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@varuns23
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just confirming if the tests already started for this PR?

@mtosi @diguida @dmitrijus @vanbesien @silviodonato

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants