Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix 2017 design workflow for '-i all' #16460

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 5, 2016

Conversation

makortel
Copy link
Contributor

@makortel makortel commented Nov 3, 2016

When introducing the 2017 design workflow in #15994, I missed the fact that with runTheMatrix.py -i all the input dataset will be queried even if the defaultDataSet['2017Design'] is set to empty string. It turns out that all other workflows that have defaultDataSet set to empty string are 2023 workflows, and for them the input dataset query is explicitly disabled.

The proposed fix is to disable the input dataset query for all workflows to which defaultDataSet is set to empty string.

Tested in CMSSW_8_1_X_2016-11-03-1100. Expecting to fix runTheMatrix.py -l 10424.0 -i all, no changes expected to anything else.

Thanks to @smuzaffar for reporting the problem.

@smuzaffar @kpedro88

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 3, 2016

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@cmsbuild, @srimanob, @davidlange6, @hengne, @fabozzi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

makortel commented Nov 3, 2016

On the other hand, maybe, in addition, we should update the 2017 and 2017Design inputs to pre15? Or maybe after pre16 when the pixel geometry should stabilize? Or leave it to later?

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

kpedro88 commented Nov 3, 2016

GEN-SIM for HCAL should be stable. How about pixel?

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

kpedro88 commented Nov 3, 2016

Ah, I see you said pixel isn't expected to stabilize until after pre16. I think we should wait until the whole detector is stable.

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

makortel commented Nov 3, 2016

To my understanding pixel should be final on pre16 (but don't take this as an authoritative statement).

@fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

fabozzi commented Nov 4, 2016

If we expect to regenerate gen-sim in pre16, then updating gensim input for Phase 1 relvals can be done later

@fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

fabozzi commented Nov 4, 2016

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 4, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/16196/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 4, 2016

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 4, 2016

Comparison job queued.

@fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

fabozzi commented Nov 4, 2016

+1

1 similar comment
@fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

fabozzi commented Nov 4, 2016

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 4, 2016

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

makortel commented Nov 4, 2016

@fabozzi

If we expect to regenerate gen-sim in pre16

Yes, the gen-sim for pre16 should be regenerated (because of FPix material updates).

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 4, 2016

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16460/16196/summary.html

The workflows 1003.0, 1001.0, 1000.0, 140.53, 136.731, 4.22 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit dc1df9f into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Nov 5, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants