New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pixel Phase I - CA - improving fake rejection at high pt #16612
Pixel Phase I - CA - improving fake rejection at high pt #16612
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for CMSSW_9_0_X. It involves the following packages: RecoPixelVertexing/PixelTriplets @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
@cmsbuild , please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
@cmsbuild please test @smuzaffar do we still have a problem running 90X tests? |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
|
Pull request #16612 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
+1 |
In the Cellular Automaton, we now require that, if two doublets are aligned in the xy-plane, they also have to be aligned with the beamspot ± (region radius + tolerance).
This has the effect of reducing the fake rate for pt > 10GeV/c, for quadruplets and especially for triplets.
@VinInn @rovere @makortel
Automatically ported from CMSSW_8_1_X #16491 (original by @felicepantaleo).