Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove obsolete tracking configuration files #16698

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Nov 22, 2016

Conversation

makortel
Copy link
Contributor

This PR suggests to remove all the now-obsolete *Phase1PU70*, *Phase1PU140*, *Phase2PU140*, and *LowPU* tracking configuration files, and a couple of others I encountered/remembered lately.

Tested in CMSSW_9_0_X_2016-11-17-2300, no changes expected.

@rovere @VinInn @ebrondol

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_9_0_X milestone Nov 20, 2016
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 20, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/16502/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for CMSSW_9_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoPixelVertexing/PixelTrackFitting
RecoTracker/Configuration
RecoTracker/ConversionSeedGenerators
RecoTracker/FinalTrackSelectors
RecoTracker/IterativeTracking

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @mschrode, @gpetruc, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@ebrondol
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @makortel

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

For #16698 991f1af

Deleting obsolete tracking config files. There should be no change in monitored quantities.

Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_9_0_X_2016-11-20-1100 show no significant differences, as expected.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 23d1e5a into cms-sw:CMSSW_9_0_X Nov 22, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants