Split cluster charge & S/N MEs for thin and thick sensors (81X) #16722
Conversation
…s separately - per ring and per disc - only for TEC as the other partitions have thin (TIB,TID) or thick (TOB) sensors only.
…/ring Also added plot ClusterChargeCorr_onTrack, for all subsystems
|
A new Pull Request was created by @lmoreels for CMSSW_8_1_X. It involves the following packages: DQM/SiStripMonitorTrack @cmsbuild, @dmitrijus, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
lmoreels
changed the title
|
+1 |
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
cmsbuild
added
dqm-approved
fully-signed
and removed
dqm-pending
pending-signatures
labels
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
|
Comparison job queued. |
The strip tracker contains thin and thick sensors. While the other partitions consist completely out of thin/thick sensors, the tracker endcap contains a mix. The thickness of the sensors influences the cluster charge and S/N, so the MEs for these are separated for thin and thick sensors in the TEC.
A PR for 90X is being prepared. Should there also be one for 80X?