New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[90X] Geometry independent SiPixelAli PCL #16749
[90X] Geometry independent SiPixelAli PCL #16749
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @ghellwig (Gregor Mittag) for CMSSW_9_0_X. It involves the following packages: Alignment/CommonAlignmentAlgorithm @ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
hold |
Pull request has been put on hold by @ghellwig |
- replaced it with namespace defined at runtime by tracker geometry - rewrote AlignableIndexer classes
- changed the customer code accordingly
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
unhold |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready The workflows 1003.0, 1001.0, 1000.0, 140.53, 136.731, 4.22 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons |
@usarica do you have any objections regarding this PR? Further development depends on its integration. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
+1 |
--> step towards unification of PCLTrackerAlProducer and AlignmentProducer