Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bring customization of tracking@HLT up to date with 8_1_0 #16867

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 6, 2016
Merged

Bring customization of tracking@HLT up to date with 8_1_0 #16867

merged 1 commit into from Dec 6, 2016

Conversation

JanFSchulte
Copy link
Contributor

As the last PR was merged in 9_0 before the last changes were made to what was finally merged into 8_1_0, this PR updates 9_0 to the latest configuration. Also, customizeHLTForPFTrackingPhaseI2017 now calls customizeHLTPhaseIPixelGeom so that it is not necessary to apply to customize functions on top of each other

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 5, 2016

A new Pull Request was created by @JanFSchulte (Jan-Frederik Schulte) for CMSSW_9_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

HLTrigger/Configuration

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @silviodonato, @Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzard, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald, @geoff-smith, @jalimena this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

makortel commented Dec 5, 2016

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 5, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/16781/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 5, 2016

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 5, 2016

Comparison job queued.

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 6, 2016

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 6, 2016

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16867/16781/summary.html

The workflows 1003.0, 1001.0, 1000.0, 140.53, 136.731, 4.22 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants