New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tracking DQM improvements #17074
tracking DQM improvements #17074
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @mtosi (mia tosi) for CMSSW_9_0_X. It involves the following packages: CommonTools/RecoAlgos @cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
from CommonTools.RecoAlgos.TrackWithVertexSelector_cfi import * | ||
|
||
trackAssociated2pvSelector = trackWithVertexSelector.clone() | ||
trackAssociated2pvSelector.trackWithVertexSelectorParams = cms.PSet( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TrackWithVertexSelector
does not have(/read) trackWithVertexSelectorParams
PSet.
What happens in TrackWithVertexSelector_cfi.py
is that the contents of trackWithVertexSelectorParams
are copied to trackWithVertexSelector
.
vertexTag = cms.InputTag('trackingDQMgoodOfflinePrimaryVertices'), | ||
timesTag = cms.InputTag(''), | ||
timeResosTag = cms.InputTag(''), | ||
nVertices = cms.uint32(0), ## how many vertices to look at before dropping the track |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nVertices == 0
disables the vertex compatibility checks, i.e. only TrackWithVertexSelector::testTrack()
gets called.
@cmsbuild , please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: 3f47885 You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: RelVals
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows: runTheMatrix-results/9.0_Higgs200ChargedTaus+Higgs200ChargedTaus+DIGI+RECO+HARVEST/step3_Higgs200ChargedTaus+Higgs200ChargedTaus+DIGI+RECO+HARVEST.log1306.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/1306.0_SingleMuPt1_UP15+SingleMuPt1_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15/step3_SingleMuPt1_UP15+SingleMuPt1_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15.log136.731 step3 runTheMatrix-results/136.731_RunSinglePh2016B+RunSinglePh2016B+HLTDR2_2016+RECODR2_2016reHLT_skimSinglePh_HIPM+HARVESTDR2/step3_RunSinglePh2016B+RunSinglePh2016B+HLTDR2_2016+RECODR2_2016reHLT_skimSinglePh_HIPM+HARVESTDR2.log25.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/25.0_TTbar+TTbar+DIGI+RECOAlCaCalo+HARVEST+ALCATT/step3_TTbar+TTbar+DIGI+RECOAlCaCalo+HARVEST+ALCATT.log1000.0 step2 runTheMatrix-results/1000.0_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0+SKIMD+HARVESTDfst2+ALCASPLIT/step2_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0+SKIMD+HARVESTDfst2+ALCASPLIT.log1001.0 step2 runTheMatrix-results/1001.0_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0EXP+ALCAEXP+ALCAHARVD1+ALCAHARVD2+ALCAHARVD3+ALCAHARVD4+ALCAHARVD5/step2_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0EXP+ALCAEXP+ALCAHARVD1+ALCAHARVD2+ALCAHARVD3+ALCAHARVD4+ALCAHARVD5.log1330.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/1330.0_ZMM_13+ZMM_13+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15/step3_ZMM_13+ZMM_13+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15.log1003.0 step2 runTheMatrix-results/1003.0_RunMinBias2012A+RunMinBias2012A+RECODDQM+HARVESTDDQM/step2_RunMinBias2012A+RunMinBias2012A+RECODDQM+HARVESTDDQM.log10021.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/10021.0_TenMuE_0_200+TenMuE_0_200_pythia8_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017/step3_TenMuE_0_200+TenMuE_0_200_pythia8_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017.log20034.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/20034.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D7_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D7+RecoFullGlobal_2023D7+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D7/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D7_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D7+RecoFullGlobal_2023D7+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D7.log50202.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/50202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50.log25202.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25.log10024.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/10024.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017.log21234.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/21234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D4_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D4+RecoFullGlobal_2023D4+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D4/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D4_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D4+RecoFullGlobal_2023D4+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D4.log23234.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/23234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D8_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D8+RecoFullGlobal_2023D8+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D8/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D8_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D8+RecoFullGlobal_2023D8+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D8.log |
Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
-1*((bs->position().y() - v0.vy()) + (v0.vz() - bs->position().z()) * bs->dydz()), | ||
0 ) ); | ||
float lxy = ( pv==nullptr ? -9. : displacementFromPV.perp() ); | ||
float lxyWRTbs = ( bs==nullptr ? -9. : displacementFromBS.perp() ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please don't use magic numbers. Use a constant for the -9 value. Also, in lines128 and 131, it would be good to set a constant null GlobalPoint and use that.
Pull request #17074 was updated. @cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
Pull request #17074 was updated. @cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
+1 |
as requested by tracking POG @VinInn @rovere
we add some plots
(these tracks are selected by using the available TrackWithVertexSelector_cfi)
(the V0 candidates are selected by a new EDProducer)