Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tracking DQM improvements #17074

Merged
merged 11 commits into from Jan 17, 2017

Conversation

mtosi
Copy link
Contributor

@mtosi mtosi commented Dec 19, 2016

as requested by tracking POG @VinInn @rovere
we add some plots

  • tracks from PV monitoring
    (these tracks are selected by using the available TrackWithVertexSelector_cfi)
  • V0 monitoring for V0 candidates w/ lxy > 16 cm
    (the V0 candidates are selected by a new EDProducer)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mtosi (mia tosi) for CMSSW_9_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/RecoAlgos
DQM/TrackingMonitor
DQM/TrackingMonitorClient
DQM/TrackingMonitorSource

@cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @hdelanno, @jdolen, @makortel, @abbiendi, @jhgoh, @ahinzmann, @gkasieczka, @fioriNTU, @idebruyn, @threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

from CommonTools.RecoAlgos.TrackWithVertexSelector_cfi import *

trackAssociated2pvSelector = trackWithVertexSelector.clone()
trackAssociated2pvSelector.trackWithVertexSelectorParams = cms.PSet(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TrackWithVertexSelector does not have(/read) trackWithVertexSelectorParams PSet.

What happens in TrackWithVertexSelector_cfi.py is that the contents of trackWithVertexSelectorParams are copied to trackWithVertexSelector.

vertexTag = cms.InputTag('trackingDQMgoodOfflinePrimaryVertices'),
timesTag = cms.InputTag(''),
timeResosTag = cms.InputTag(''),
nVertices = cms.uint32(0), ## how many vertices to look at before dropping the track
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nVertices == 0 disables the vertex compatibility checks, i.e. only TrackWithVertexSelector::testTrack() gets called.

@VinInn
Copy link
Contributor

VinInn commented Dec 19, 2016

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 19, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/17110/console Started: 2016/12/19 17:09

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 3f47885

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17074/17110/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
9.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/9.0_Higgs200ChargedTaus+Higgs200ChargedTaus+DIGI+RECO+HARVEST/step3_Higgs200ChargedTaus+Higgs200ChargedTaus+DIGI+RECO+HARVEST.log

1306.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/1306.0_SingleMuPt1_UP15+SingleMuPt1_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15/step3_SingleMuPt1_UP15+SingleMuPt1_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15.log

136.731 step3
runTheMatrix-results/136.731_RunSinglePh2016B+RunSinglePh2016B+HLTDR2_2016+RECODR2_2016reHLT_skimSinglePh_HIPM+HARVESTDR2/step3_RunSinglePh2016B+RunSinglePh2016B+HLTDR2_2016+RECODR2_2016reHLT_skimSinglePh_HIPM+HARVESTDR2.log

25.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/25.0_TTbar+TTbar+DIGI+RECOAlCaCalo+HARVEST+ALCATT/step3_TTbar+TTbar+DIGI+RECOAlCaCalo+HARVEST+ALCATT.log

1000.0 step2
runTheMatrix-results/1000.0_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0+SKIMD+HARVESTDfst2+ALCASPLIT/step2_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0+SKIMD+HARVESTDfst2+ALCASPLIT.log

1001.0 step2
runTheMatrix-results/1001.0_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0EXP+ALCAEXP+ALCAHARVD1+ALCAHARVD2+ALCAHARVD3+ALCAHARVD4+ALCAHARVD5/step2_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0EXP+ALCAEXP+ALCAHARVD1+ALCAHARVD2+ALCAHARVD3+ALCAHARVD4+ALCAHARVD5.log

1330.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/1330.0_ZMM_13+ZMM_13+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15/step3_ZMM_13+ZMM_13+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15.log

1003.0 step2
runTheMatrix-results/1003.0_RunMinBias2012A+RunMinBias2012A+RECODDQM+HARVESTDDQM/step2_RunMinBias2012A+RunMinBias2012A+RECODDQM+HARVESTDDQM.log

10021.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/10021.0_TenMuE_0_200+TenMuE_0_200_pythia8_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017/step3_TenMuE_0_200+TenMuE_0_200_pythia8_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017.log

20034.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/20034.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D7_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D7+RecoFullGlobal_2023D7+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D7/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D7_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D7+RecoFullGlobal_2023D7+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D7.log

50202.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/50202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50.log

25202.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25.log

10024.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/10024.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017.log

21234.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/21234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D4_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D4+RecoFullGlobal_2023D4+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D4/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D4_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D4+RecoFullGlobal_2023D4+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D4.log

23234.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/23234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D8_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D8+RecoFullGlobal_2023D8+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D8/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D8_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFull_2023D8+RecoFullGlobal_2023D8+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D8.log

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

-1*((bs->position().y() - v0.vy()) + (v0.vz() - bs->position().z()) * bs->dydz()),
0 ) );
float lxy = ( pv==nullptr ? -9. : displacementFromPV.perp() );
float lxyWRTbs = ( bs==nullptr ? -9. : displacementFromBS.perp() );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't use magic numbers. Use a constant for the -9 value. Also, in lines128 and 131, it would be good to set a constant null GlobalPoint and use that.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #17074 was updated. @cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 9, 2017

Pull request #17074 was updated. @cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jan 9, 2017

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 9, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/17214/console Started: 2017/01/09 19:40

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 9, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 9, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 9, 2017

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jan 10, 2017

+1

for #17074 73b0317

  • reco parts of this PR, related to vertexCompositeCandidateCollectionSelector look OK. It is a new module not affecting reco products
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with baseline show no differences

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 54142ef into cms-sw:CMSSW_9_0_X Jan 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants