Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bsunanda:Run2-alca74 Make IsoTrack AlCaReco as well as tree makers to be equally useful for all possible isolation strategy #17100

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Mar 2, 2017

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda bsunanda commented Dec 27, 2016

Correct for soft and eta-dependent isolation strategy. There are eta dependent isolation energy cut off versus a eta-independent cut off. The value whichever is larger is used as the cut off

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 28, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/17163/console Started: 2016/12/28 10:20

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for CMSSW_9_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

Calibration/HcalAlCaRecoProducers
Calibration/HcalCalibAlgos
Calibration/IsolatedParticles

@ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mmusich Kindly approve this.

@@ -26,5 +25,9 @@
ConeRadiusMIP = cms.double(14.0),
MinimumTrackP = cms.double(20.0),
MaximumEcalEnergy = cms.double(2.0),
IsolationEnergy = cms.double(10.0),
MaxTrackP = cms.double(8.0),
SlopeTrackP = cms.double(0.05090504066),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bsunanda can you document from where does this magic number come from? Do you really need 10 digits?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was documented in a DN - it is the result of expanding an exponential

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bsunanda - could you add the DN reference here so its easy to find later. Thanks

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DN-2016/029 and the magic # was log(2.5)/18. It came from a study by Marina Chadeeva to define eta dependent cut

@franzoni
Copy link

@bsunanda

we gather the selections have been changed and generally loosened.
Do you know what the impact on the resulting alcareco will be ?
Already last year there were concerns about the size per femtobarn .

once you'll have numbers, would you be willing to report at a forthcoming AlCa/Db meeting ?

Thanks.

@franzoni
Copy link

@ghellwig
hello Gregor, would it be possible for you to follow this PR ?
You did similar cross-checks on rates in the past.
Thanks!

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@franzoni @ghellwig OK I shall report in the next AlCa meeting. I thought the IsoTrack data set was not so large.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@franzoni Kindly accept this PR. I shall try to see how to reduce the data storage requirement (1) by using a handle which can be changed without changing the C++ code (2) by balancing event rate in barrel and endcap

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@franzoni Please sign this PR

@franzoni
Copy link

hello @bsunanda
@deguio @hatakeyamak
thanks for the report at the AlCa meeting yesterday https://indico.cern.ch/event/592614/contributions/2463744/

We agreed that we need to:

. quantify the max number of GB/fb an alcareco essential for the HCAL calibration program can write =->AlCa/Db ; we agreed that the increase 30-70 GB => 1200-3000 GB per fb is not sustainable
. find ways of reducing the rate post relaxation of the isolation requirement (prescale of the filter, careful selection of the HLT paths in input via trigger bits) =-> HCAL DPG
. plan a time evolution of such rates, which can be more generous at the start of data taking and reduced later on ( =-> HCAL DPG)

the last two topics are suitable for discussion at the AlCa/dB workshop.
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/calibrations/2821.html

@franzoni
Copy link

+1

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Mar 1, 2017

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 1, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18021/console Started: 2017/03/01 01:08
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18024/console Started: 2017/03/01 11:34

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Mar 1, 2017

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 1, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18026/console Started: 2017/03/01 12:11

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 1, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 1, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 1, 2017

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Mar 1, 2017

@franzoni Now we have only 2 types of isolation cut - eta dependent and a flat value. we take the larger of the two to make the cut - it was similar in the past (there were an extra flat value which was redundant) - but the net results were the same which I mentioned in the AlCaReco meeting. Can you please approve this - it is now more than 2 months old.

@franzoni
Copy link

franzoni commented Mar 2, 2017

+1
Thanks @bsunanda for the clarification.
We ought to keep #17100 (comment) in consideration, also debated during Olga's talk at the alcadb workshop

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 2, 2017

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants