New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bsunanda:Run2-alca74 Make IsoTrack AlCaReco as well as tree makers to be equally useful for all possible isolation strategy #17100
Conversation
@cmsbuild Please test |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for CMSSW_9_0_X. It involves the following packages: Calibration/HcalAlCaRecoProducers @ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
Comparison job queued. |
@mmusich Kindly approve this. |
@@ -26,5 +25,9 @@ | |||
ConeRadiusMIP = cms.double(14.0), | |||
MinimumTrackP = cms.double(20.0), | |||
MaximumEcalEnergy = cms.double(2.0), | |||
IsolationEnergy = cms.double(10.0), | |||
MaxTrackP = cms.double(8.0), | |||
SlopeTrackP = cms.double(0.05090504066), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bsunanda can you document from where does this magic number come from? Do you really need 10 digits?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was documented in a DN - it is the result of expanding an exponential
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bsunanda - could you add the DN reference here so its easy to find later. Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DN-2016/029 and the magic # was log(2.5)/18. It came from a study by Marina Chadeeva to define eta dependent cut
we gather the selections have been changed and generally loosened. once you'll have numbers, would you be willing to report at a forthcoming AlCa/Db meeting ? Thanks. |
@ghellwig |
@franzoni Kindly accept this PR. I shall try to see how to reduce the data storage requirement (1) by using a handle which can be changed without changing the C++ code (2) by balancing event rate in barrel and endcap |
@franzoni Please sign this PR |
hello @bsunanda We agreed that we need to: . quantify the max number of GB/fb an alcareco essential for the HCAL calibration program can write =->AlCa/Db ; we agreed that the increase 30-70 GB => 1200-3000 GB per fb is not sustainable the last two topics are suitable for discussion at the AlCa/dB workshop. |
+1 |
@cmsbuild Please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
@cmsbuild Please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
@franzoni Now we have only 2 types of isolation cut - eta dependent and a flat value. we take the larger of the two to make the cut - it was similar in the past (there were an extra flat value which was redundant) - but the net results were the same which I mentioned in the AlCaReco meeting. Can you please approve this - it is now more than 2 months old. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
+1 |
Correct for soft and eta-dependent isolation strategy. There are eta dependent isolation energy cut off versus a eta-independent cut off. The value whichever is larger is used as the cut off