Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dead ES regions with corrected energy for each plane. Fixes inconsistency in regression training #17145

Merged

Conversation

argiro
Copy link
Contributor

@argiro argiro commented Jan 11, 2017

No description provided.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @argiro for CMSSW_9_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterTools

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @lgray, @rafaellopesdesa, @bachtis, @cbernet this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jan 11, 2017

@argiro
please provide some details on expected changes in performance.
Ideally, a link to slides or other similar document would work.

Thank you.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jan 11, 2017

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 11, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/17247/console Started: 2017/01/11 19:02

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jan 13, 2017

@argiro in case you missed,
please respond to #17145 (comment)

Thank you

@argiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

argiro commented Jan 16, 2017

@slava77 sorry for the late reply, here is some material in slide 4.
Presumably there will be no appreciable changes in the comparison, but the way in which the energy is reassigned to the dead/working plane matters for the regression

https://indico.cern.ch/event/578798/contributions/2398509/attachments/1386873/2111046/20161212_ES_Status.pdf

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jan 18, 2017

+1

for #17145 72dba60

  • changes are in line with the description in the supplied slides
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with baseline show no differences
  • local tests with several other available matrix data workflows for 2016 show no differences in the outputs ... and the reason is that the GT for data uses ESEEIntercalibConstantsRcd ESEEIntercalibConstants_LG_offline_data_default which has gammaLow1,2=1 and these lead to identical values for PS before and after the changes in this PR.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit b566d04 into cms-sw:CMSSW_9_0_X Jan 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants