Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

80X electron and photon energy regression for user analysis #17318

Merged

Conversation

rafaellopesdesa
Copy link
Contributor

This is the current electron and photon energy and resolution regression recommended by the EGM group for 80X analysis. The documentation about it can be found here:

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/EGMRegression (data-MC residuals will be release this week, but do not alter this PR).

This is a user-application and does not change any of the comparisons performed during tests. The reason why this does not go into RecoEgamma is because the structure of the regression changed substantially and the codes are no longer compatible (ie, it's not a simple change of configuration... even though the code is very similar... there was really no reason to do a different code all together). Since 80X cannot have changes in the RECO sequence, we would like to provide these energy regressions as a user-app code, as in this PR. This will only exist in 80X. In 81X and 90X the code will go into the RECO sequence (in RecoEgamma). The PRs will follow the inclusions of the tags in the GT, so that validation can be done. I've already requested the inclusion in the 90X GT and the PRs should follow shortly.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @rafaellopesdesa (Rafael Lopes de Sa) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

EgammaAnalysis/ElectronTools

@cmsbuild, @monttj, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Sam-Harper this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jan 30, 2017

@cmsbuild please test
IIRC this PR doesn't lead to anything running in unit tests (no need to wait for the GT update to run compilation tests)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 30, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/17496/console Started: 2017/01/30 16:38

@monttj
Copy link
Contributor

monttj commented Jan 30, 2017

+1
This is the official recipe already being used in EGamma POG.
It does not affect the official miniAOD workflow as described.
It looks ok from my side.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

#include "Geometry/CaloEventSetup/interface/CaloTopologyRecord.h"

#include <vdt/vdtMath.h>
#include <TFile.h>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @rafaellopesdesa - this include is not needed. Please remove it

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #17318 was updated. @cmsbuild, @monttj, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/17572/console Started: 2017/02/01 20:04

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants