phaseI geometry updates, alignment ideal pixel and realistic strip, ideal phaseI BS away from 000

[franzoni]

Summary of changes in Global Tags

RunII simulation

• PhaseI 2017 cosmics scenario : 90X_upgrade2017cosmics_realistic_peak_v7 as 90X_upgrade2017cosmics_realistic_peak_v6 with the following changes:

  • geometry updates to fit large-size pixel reactivated, see Tracker Overlap Bugfixes Tracker Overlap Bugfixes #17383 and Replace Polycone in Pixel Fwd Replace Polycone in Pixel Fwd #17387 https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/calibrations/2803/1.html
  • alignment payload with ideal pixel and strip as in the current realistic phase-0 scenario (en par with phase0 as far as pixel are concerned)

• PhaseI 2017 design scenario : 90X_upgrade2017_design_IdealBS_v7 as 90X_upgrade2017_design_IdealBS_v6 with the following changes:

  • Ideal_Centered_SLHC_v3 is physics-wise the same as Ideal_Centered_SLHC_v2, except small 1E-5 displacement in Z to stay away from 000
  • geometry updates to fit large-size pixel reactivated, Tracker Overlap Bugfixes Tracker Overlap Bugfixes #17383 and Replace Polycone in Pixel Fwd Replace Polycone in Pixel Fwd #17387 , see : https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/calibrations/2803/1.html

• PhaseI 2017 realistic scenario : 90X_upgrade2017_realistic_v7 as 90X_upgrade2017_realistic_v6 with the following changes:

  • geometry updates to fit large-size pixel reactivated, see Tracker Overlap Bugfixes Tracker Overlap Bugfixes #17383 and Replace Polycone in Pixel Fwd Replace Polycone in Pixel Fwd #17387 https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/calibrations/2803/1.html
  • alignment payload with ideal pixel and strip as in the current realistic phase-0 scenario (en par with phase0 as far as pixel are concerned)

• PhaseI 2018 cosmics scenario : 90X_upgrade2018cosmics_realistic_peak_v5 as 90X_upgrade2018cosmics_realistic_peak_v4 with the following changes:

  • geometry updates to fit large-size pixel reactivated, see Tracker Overlap Bugfixes Tracker Overlap Bugfixes #17383 and Replace Polycone in Pixel Fwd Replace Polycone in Pixel Fwd #17387 https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/calibrations/2803/1.html
  • alignment payload with ideal pixel and strip as in the current realistic phase-0 scenario (en par with phase0 as far as pixel are concerned)

• PhaseI 2018 design scenario : 90X_upgrade2018_design_IdealBS_v5 as 90X_upgrade2018_design_IdealBS_v4 with the following changes:

  • Ideal_Centered_SLHC_v3 is physics-wise the same as Ideal_Centered_SLHC_v2, except small 1E-5 displacement in Z to stay away from 000
  • geometry updates to fit large-size pixel reactivated, see Tracker Overlap Bugfixes Tracker Overlap Bugfixes #17383 and Replace Polycone in Pixel Fwd Replace Polycone in Pixel Fwd #17387 https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/calibrations/2803/1.html

• PhaseI 2018 realistic scenario : 90X_upgrade2018_realistic_v5 as 90X_upgrade2018_realistic_v4 with the following changes:

  • geometry updates to fit large-size pixel reactivated, see Tracker Overlap Bugfixes Tracker Overlap Bugfixes #17383 and Replace Polycone in Pixel Fwd Replace Polycone in Pixel Fwd #17387 https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/calibrations/2803/1.html
  • alignment payload with ideal pixel and strip as in the current realistic phase-0 scenario (en par with phase0 as far as pixel are concerned)

[franzoni]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/17650/console Started: 2017/02/07 03:18

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @franzoni (Giovanni Franzoni) for CMSSW_9_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/AlCa

@ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald, @ghellwig, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 733592d
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17437/17650/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17437/17650/summary.html

[franzoni]

+1

. observed differences in MC 2017 workflows -> ok.
. oddly, observed differences also in the 2016B data (un-justified since this PR only modifies GT's for MC workflows), concentrated in AlCaReco/SiStrip

. thanks to @mmusich for the records,
I gather such fluctuation in might relate to https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSTRACK-151
( needs follow up )

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[franzoni]

hello @davidlange6

Due to the PPD workshop ongoing -> I won't be able to attend ORP tonight - apologies.

It would be great if this PR ( @slava77 : do you want to inspect it? )
could be merged at earliest convenience
there's more conditions expected (not yet in AlCa db hands) due to come in by pre4
( HCAL detector type, pixel local conditions)

[davidlange6]

+1