New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Turn-on by default the MaxSample algo for EB for gain-switching hits #17442
Turn-on by default the MaxSample algo for EB for gain-switching hits #17442
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @emanueledimarco (Emanuele Di Marco) for CMSSW_9_0_X. It involves the following packages: RecoLocalCalo/EcalRecProducers @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
@emanueledimarco Is the implementation delivered with gainSwitchUseMaxSampleEB appropriate for that or will you need to make a change to it? |
@argiro |
On 08 Feb 2017, at 11:06, Slava Krutelyov ***@***.***> wrote:
@argiro
just to clarify, do you mean that the issue with setting of kOutTime seen in the patched workflow is not happening here (and the flags are set appropriately)?
yes, the Multifit module does set flags appropriately
… —
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
+1
The effect on data with gain switch is expected to be significant, in agreement with earlier studies in 80X. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
+1 |
In 90X this is the tested option on both data and MC. It could be replaced by more sophisticated multifit versions if tested OK in time.
This is related to PR #17259 (80X) and PR #17279 (90X).