Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Turn-on by default the MaxSample algo for EB for gain-switching hits #17442

Conversation

emanueledimarco
Copy link
Contributor

In 90X this is the tested option on both data and MC. It could be replaced by more sophisticated multifit versions if tested OK in time.
This is related to PR #17259 (80X) and PR #17279 (90X).

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 7, 2017

A new Pull Request was created by @emanueledimarco (Emanuele Di Marco) for CMSSW_9_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoLocalCalo/EcalRecProducers

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Feb 7, 2017

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 7, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/17663/console Started: 2017/02/07 14:07

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 7, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 7, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 7, 2017

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Feb 7, 2017

@emanueledimarco
if I'm not mistaken, in 80X we switched from max sample to global reco for the gain-switch
ed952ac

Is the implementation delivered with gainSwitchUseMaxSampleEB appropriate for that or will you need to make a change to it?

@argiro
Copy link
Contributor

argiro commented Feb 8, 2017

@slava77, ed952ac was for the re-miniaAOD fix, which is a patched workflow. This is a fix for the standard production workflow embedded in the multifit module.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Feb 8, 2017

@argiro
just to clarify, do you mean that the issue with setting of kOutTime seen in the patched workflow is not happening here (and the flags are set appropriately)?

@argiro
Copy link
Contributor

argiro commented Feb 8, 2017 via email

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Feb 9, 2017

+1

for #17442 d3d9722

  • ecal EB hit reco change as described, affecting both data and MC
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons show small differences only in RunSinglePh2016B wf 136.731, consistent with the change made in this PR
  • local test with single ele 1TeV gun shows mostly very small changes. The most significant change is in the low-chi2 EB rechit population; the hit energies are essentially unchanged; occasional changes in EB hit energies propagate downstream without any particular pattern

wf1316_eb_chi2

wf1316_eb_e5x5_over_sim

The effect on data with gain switch is expected to be significant, in agreement with earlier studies in 80X.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 9, 2017

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 0778ea9 into cms-sw:CMSSW_9_0_X Feb 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants