Removed legacy b tagging using tight track selection from MiniAOD

[ferencek]

This PR addresses the issue discussed in #17573

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ferencek (Dinko Ferencek) for master.

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/PatAlgos

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @monttj, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @gouskos, @imarches, @ahinzmann, @acaudron, @mmarionncern, @rappoccio, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @gpetruc, @gkasieczka, @schoef, @ferencek, @mverzett, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder, @JyothsnaKomaragiri this is something you requested to watch as well.
@Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18266/console Started: 2017/03/09 00:54

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 2eac3fd
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17839/18266/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17839/18266/summary.html

[perrotta]

+1
Tiny differences in the slimmed jets, and in the DQM analyses which use them.
No significant effect on the event size (tiny reduction, though)

[slava77]

@perrotta
jenkins comparisons report is not available anymore.
which differences did you see in the slimmed jets and where?
Please clarify.
Thank you.

[perrotta]

Indeed, I looked at the jenkins comparisons yesterday, but as you say the report today is not available any more (not even for the 90X version of this PR): that's why I did not put the link. We can try to reconstruct some comparison from scratch, if you think so. Feel free of putting this PR on hold, if you want to apply some extra check. Slava Krutelyov <notifications@github.com> ha scritto:

…

@perrotta jenkins comparisons report is not available anymore. which differences did you see in the slimmed jets and where? Please clarify. Thank you. -- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #17839 (comment)

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[perrotta]

please test
(addon's failed beacause of file access issues)

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18721/console Started: 2017/03/27 12:06

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 2eac3fd
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17839/18721/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17839/18721/summary.html

[monttj]

+1

[perrotta]

+1
(Once again)
No significant effect on the event size (tiny reduction, though)
Differences are observed in the slimmed jets related plots: however, they look like being due to different roundings originated by having touched the slimmed jets, and do not affect significantly the jet parameters, see e.g.
--- Muon Energy fraction's in slimmed jets:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_9_1_X_2017-03-26-1100+17839/19027/1330.0_ZMM_13+ZMM_13+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15/JetMET_JetValidation_slimmedJets.html
--- Event logger in Physics/Top/SingleTopElectronMediumDQM_miniAOD:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_9_1_X_2017-03-26-1100+17839/19027/10024.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017/Physics_Top_SingleTopElectronMediumDQM_miniAOD_presel.html

[perrotta]

unhold

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1