New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Speed Up Cellular Automaton implementation #18002
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @VinInn (Vincenzo Innocente) for master. It involves the following packages: RecoPixelVertexing/PixelTriplets @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
@cmsbuild, please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: 8f311a0 You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: RelVals AddOn
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows: runTheMatrix-results/10042.0_ZMM_13+ZMM_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017/step2_ZMM_13+ZMM_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017.log10824.0 step2 runTheMatrix-results/10824.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2018_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2018+RecoFull_2018+ALCAFull_2018+HARVESTFull_2018/step2_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2018_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2018+RecoFull_2018+ALCAFull_2018+HARVESTFull_2018.log
I found errors in the following addon tests: |
Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
I hardly believe that this PR is the cause of the test failure |
yea, but if you solve everything noted in the comment, you'll likely be ok - two 2017/2018 workflows failed.. 10042 and 10824
Module: CAHitQuadrupletEDProducer (crashed)
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18002/18576/runTheMatrix-results/10042.0_ZMM_13+ZMM_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017/step2_ZMM_13+ZMM_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017.log
certainly related..
… On Mar 21, 2017, at 10:06 AM, Vincenzo Innocente ***@***.***> wrote:
I hardly believe that this PR is the cause of the test failure
Would have been much more useful to have a list of the failed AddOn
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
Interesting, as I have run on three different datasets and never crashed |
The segfault is in HLT, could there be some special case that is not treated properly now? |
maybe HLT takes a different path? (there is code that is copy/paste four times...) |
Pull request #18002 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
Not obvious what is doing in HLT, we need to check in details. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
|
||
CACell(const HitDoublets* doublets, int doubletId, const int innerHitId, const int outerHitId) : | ||
theDoublets(doublets), theDoubletId(doubletId) | ||
,theInnerR(doublets->rv(doubletId, HitDoublets::inner)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is different that original (now w/r/t/ beamspot)
Comparison job queued. |
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
+1 |
Most purely technical changes that produces no regression and speedup CA by about a factor 2
We took the opportunity to fix a small imperfection in the use of the radius the now is w/r/t the beam spot. The effect is mostly to sharpen the pt cut. This change produces minor regressions.
Timing for PU200 ttbar phase2
Timing at PU50 PhaseI
MTV for ttbar PU0
http://innocent.home.cern.ch/innocent/RelVal/vectCA3/plots_highPurity/effandfake1.pdf
where blue is 900, red is technical only and black is this PR