New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding Timing vs BX plots, and modifying thresholds for laser quality #18067
Merged
cmsbuild
merged 3 commits into
cms-sw:master
from
tanmaymudholkar:TimingVsBX_and_LaserTiming_91X
Apr 1, 2017
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b62bdfe
Added new plot for mean partition timing vs BX to TimingTask.
tanmaymudholkar f957a08
Changed expected value of laser timing for green laser, changed the d…
tanmaymudholkar e131c90
Changed array to std::array to improve code readability.
tanmaymudholkar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
use std::array<int,nBXBins+1>
@tanmaymudholkar
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @davidlange6 , thanks for the suggestion, but using std::array is inconsistent with the syntax used here: https://github.com/tanmaymudholkar/cmssw/blob/TimingVsBX_and_LaserTiming_91X/DQM/EcalMonitorTasks/src/TimingTask.cc#L65
I used this construction to remain consistent with another very similar plot that we've had for some time: https://github.com/tanmaymudholkar/cmssw/blob/TimingVsBX_and_LaserTiming_91X/DQM/EcalMonitorTasks/src/TrigPrimTask.cc#L79-L80
Perhaps I could try to replace both of them by std::vectors that read in the bin values from the config file? According to documentation, this should still work with std::upper_bound(), but the changes might take me some time (~1 day) to test etc. Please advise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did this not work?
int* pBin(std::upper_bound(bxBinEdges_.begin(), bxBinEdges_.end(), _evt.bunchCrossing()));
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @davidlange6 , thanks very much for that suggestion. It does indeed improve code readability. I've tested the changes and added a commit to this PR and to the 900 PR: #18069
Please let me know if you have other suggestions. Thanks!