New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Slightly better HIP un-mitigation in 91X #18245
Conversation
…h performs better
A new Pull Request was created by @gpetruc (Giovanni Petrucciani) for master. It involves the following packages: RecoTracker/IterativeTracking @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
[the 4th bin is MAX_CONSECUTIVE_LOST_HITS] the longer tracks are of a bit worse quality (small chi2 prob) |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
+1 |
Update era-based muon HIP unmitigation of #17807 to better match the 80X version #18218, which performs somewhat better (higher hit efficiency on good muons)