Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

By default digitize single partition ME0 geometry with custom parameters #18302

Merged

Conversation

nickmccoll
Copy link
Contributor

PR #18113 Updated the digitizer to use either the built-in geometry or the custom one defined in the parameter set. For single partition geometries, which will not be used in the Muon TDR, this resulted in a single partition digitization. In order to allow for better default behavior in geometries such as D4 the default is to now use the custom geometry whenever there is a single partition geometry.

The "useBuiltInGeo" parameter wasn't useful for geometries other than single partition ones. It would return an error if you tried to use it on a multi-partition one. Instead it was replaced with "useCusGeoFor1PartGeo" which is only used on single partition geometries. No change in the reconstruction for the default, D12 geometry.

D4 geometry (1 partition) before this PR:
hitMap_D4_beforePR.pdf

D4 geometry (1 partition) after this PR:
hitMap_D4_afterPR.pdf

D12 geometry (8 partition) before this PR:
hitMap_D12_beforePR.pdf

D12 geometry (8 partition) after this PR:
hitMap_D12_afterPR.pdf

There is a displacement in local (chamber) coordinates between D4 and D12. This is due tot he placement of the eta partitions within the D4 geo. It doesn't affect segment reconstruction as it is simply a uniform displacement in Y.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @nickmccoll (Nick McColl) for master.

It involves the following packages:

SimMuon/GEMDigitizer

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @kpedro88, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@jhgoh this is something you requested to watch as well.
@Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Apr 11, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 11, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/19079/console Started: 2017/04/11 09:41

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18302/19079/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2193 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 23
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1921073
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 21262
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1899638
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 173
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 94 log files, 14 edm output root files, 23 DQM output files

@@ -183,11 +184,20 @@ void ME0ReDigiProducer::beginRun(const edm::Run&, const edm::EventSetup& eventSe
eventSetup.get<MuonGeometryRecord>().get(hGeom);
geometry= &*hGeom;

const auto& chambers = geometry->chambers();
if(!chambers.size())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably better to use:

if(chambers.empty())

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #18302 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @kpedro88, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 11, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/19104/console Started: 2017/04/11 16:47

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18302/19104/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 574 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 23
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1921107
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 29584
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1891350
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 173
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 94 log files, 14 edm output root files, 23 DQM output files

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Apr 12, 2017

+1

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Comparison changes only in ME0 digis and rechits for 2023 workflows, as expected.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 919db20 into cms-sw:master Apr 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants