New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[91X] Geometry-independent MillePede validation #18570
[91X] Geometry-independent MillePede validation #18570
Conversation
…try-dependent names in MPS validation.
This is also a first step towards running the MPS validation w/o checking out 'Alignment/MillePedeAlignmentAlgorithm'.
- create it depending on the used tracker geometry - allows to use different geometries with the same release area - checking out MPS is no longer required to run 'mps_validate.py'
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @ghellwig (Gregor Mittag) for CMSSW_9_1_X. It involves the following packages: Alignment/MillePedeAlignmentAlgorithm @ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_9_2_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
hello @davidlange6 |
+1 |
backport of #18550