Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small bugfix and several new features for the geometry comparison tool #18699

Merged

Conversation

cschomak
Copy link
Contributor

  • Fixed bug in absolute position that caused the absolute positions in the GC tool to be slightly off (global position record applied twice, 0.1-0.2 cm effect in 2016 data), relative shifts were not affected

  • Changed x-axis of the displayed geometry (previously from first "new" alignment, now from the old one)

  • Added profile plots to get a better feeling for the trends than from the scatter plots alone

  • Added tables for the mean shifts and absolute positions of the subdetectors

  • Replaced cout by LogInfo statements

…ifts and absolute positions added, ordering of displayed comparison changed, cout statements replaced by edm::LogInfo
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @cschomak for master.

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/OfflineValidation

@ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mschrode, @ghellwig, @mmusich, @tocheng, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@franzoni
Copy link

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 11, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/19771/console Started: 2017/05/11 19:29

Copy link

@ghellwig ghellwig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fine with the changes, but unless there is no strong reason, please make the booleans emulated with TStrings real booleans

@@ -266,7 +288,18 @@ void GeometryComparisonPlotter::MakePlots (vector<TString> x, // axes to combine
_window_width,
_window_height);
c_global[ic]->Divide(x.size(),y.size());

if (_make_profile_plots == "true") {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cschomak is there a reason why a boolean is represented as a string?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really. There were already some booleans represented as string and I did not think about it and stuck to it. I changed them now

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18699/19771/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 1690 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 24
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1830138
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 26778
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1803180
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 180
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 98 log files, 14 edm output root files, 24 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #18699 was updated. @ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@ghellwig
Copy link

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 14, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/19810/console Started: 2017/05/14 20:55

@ghellwig
Copy link

+1
provided jenkins agrees
thanks @cschomak

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18699/19810/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • You potentially added 3 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 37 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 24
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1830696
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2385
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1828131
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 180
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 98 log files, 14 edm output root files, 24 DQM output files

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 7a463e8 into cms-sw:master May 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants