New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CTPPS: DQM configuration fix #18718
CTPPS: DQM configuration fix #18718
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @jan-kaspar for master. It involves the following packages: DQM/CTPPS @cmsbuild, @dmitrijus, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@forthommel : I can do, but this is not a reco PR. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Many thanks, @perrotta! |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
@dmitrijus, @vanbesien, can we help you somehow for your review? |
@jan-kaspar @forthommel could you please make a back port PR for 91X asap? thanks. Tomas (DQM). Broen and Dmitrijus will be available Friday the soonest. |
Pull request #18718 was updated. @cmsbuild, @dmitrijus, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
I've added a comment, which has to be addressed. |
Hi @dmitrijus |
@@ -12,15 +12,14 @@ | |||
# for testing in lxplus | |||
process.load("DQM.Integration.config.fileinputsource_cfi") | |||
process.source.fileNames = cms.untracked.vstring( | |||
'file:/afs/cern.ch/user/j/jkaspar/public/run273062_ls0001-2_stream.root', | |||
#'root://eostotem.cern.ch//eos/totem/user/j/jkaspar/04C8034A-9626-E611-9B6E-02163E011F93.root' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This won't work online. You must use "DQM.Integration.config.inputsource_cfi", the "fileinputsource_cfi" is for testing/development only!
Also, for testing, you can also use (with inputsource_cfi): cmsRun <my_online_dqm_client> inputFiles="a.root,b.root"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Dmitrijus,
the lines you talk about would not be executed since the test
variable is set to False:
https://github.com/CTPPS/cmssw/blob/07882d194c34f8cf39ea91471c3f9ca176af35bc/DQM/Integration/python/clients/ctpps_dqm_sourceclient-live_cfg.py#L5
Nevertheless, if you prefer, I can remove the "test" block completely - let me know.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I missed the if block, sorry :(
I forgot to press "submit" button, you should see it now. |
+1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
Several fixes for CTPPS DQM configuration. Important for commissioning/calibration at the LHC restart.