Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[92X] Apply surface parameters only if selected for alignment. #18904

Merged

Conversation

ghellwig
Copy link

Mainly a cosmetic fix to ensure that flat modules stay flat when the surfaces are not included in the alignment fit.
Only cosmetic because the created payload is normally not used, but in case someone accidentally loads both alignment and surfaces from the output file, the correct behaviour is ensured now also for ideal surfaces.

@ghellwig
Copy link
Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 23, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/20048/console Started: 2017/05/23 20:26

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @ghellwig (Gregor Mittag) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/CommonAlignmentParametrization

@ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @pakhotin, @tocheng, @tlampen, @mschrode, @mmusich this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18904/20048/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 1687 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 24
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1832990
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 56662
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 66
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1776082
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 180
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 98 log files, 14 edm output root files, 24 DQM output files

@ghellwig
Copy link
Author

ping

@ghellwig
Copy link
Author

ghellwig commented Jun 6, 2017

ping @franzoni @arunhep

@arunhep
Copy link
Contributor

arunhep commented Jun 6, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 6, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/20345/console Started: 2017/06/06 13:12

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 6, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 6, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 6, 2017

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18904/20345/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • You potentially added 192 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 3413 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 23
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1837639
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 19285
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1818181
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 173
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 94 log files, 14 edm output root files, 23 DQM output files

@arunhep
Copy link
Contributor

arunhep commented Jun 8, 2017

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2017

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 643a6fe into cms-sw:master Jun 8, 2017
@ghellwig ghellwig deleted the fix-empty-surface-handling_92X branch June 12, 2017 09:21
@ghellwig
Copy link
Author

thanks @arunhep!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants