New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Roll back era for early Run 2 heavy-ion relval worflow #19495
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @mandrenguyen for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/PyReleaseValidation @kkousour, @kpedro88, @fabozzi, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
The actual Era used in most of 2015 was Run2_25ns. Is there a specific reason to use 50ns for HI? |
@kpedro88 Since we have a long bunch spacing for PbPb, I thought we ran the detectors in 50ns mode. Now that I look back at the original customize though, I see that you're right, we used the 25ns settings. |
On 6/30/17 6:51 AM, mandrenguyen wrote:
@kpedro88 <https://github.com/kpedro88> Since we have a long bunch
spacing for PbPb, I thought we ran the detectors in 50ns mode. Now that
I look back at the original customize though, I see that you're right,
we used the 25ns settings.
For reference, see customisePostLS1_HI, here:
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration/python/postLS1Customs.py
I will switch that, thanks!
There is a Run2_HI era which is supposed to cover the needs present
earlier in the customisePostLS1_HI
… —
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#19495 (comment)>, or
mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEdcbkbBodAl9FkTSO0DhGYY35wc_Tapks5sJP1pgaJpZM4OKk0f>.
|
AFAIK it is a sub-era of 2015, ie, need to use: |
On 6/30/17 7:10 AM, Martin Grunewald wrote:
AFAIK it is a sub-era of 2015, ie, need to use: |--era=Run2_2015,Run2_HI|
I vaguely recall that when I converted the T0 setup from customise to
eras I have checked
that the Run2_HI (used in
DataProcessing/python/Impl/HeavyIonsEra_Run2_HI.py)
delivers the same as what was used in 75X.
... also, there is no Run2_2015 era
…
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#19495 (comment)>, or
mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEdcbr6E1CcOixsyyE1naU-Qye2qUzxgks5sJQHlgaJpZM4OKk0f>.
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Hmm, ok, in fact what I use is --era=Run2_2016,Run2_HI, but you want 2015, right? |
On 6/30/17 7:46 AM, Martin Grunewald wrote:
Hmm, ok, in fact what I use is --era=Run2_2015,Run2_HI, but you want
2015, right?
git grep Run2_2015
produces 0 hits.
I suppose the cmsDriver ignores it and we are back to just Run2_HI
that I think is enough.
…
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#19495 (comment)>, or
mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEdcbmzlWYYctARSR1WYj3c6bmeHv6pVks5sJQpSgaJpZM4OKk0f>.
|
--era=Run2_2016,Run2_HI, |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Only Run2_HI is needed for the era.
Pull request #19495 was updated. @kkousour, @kpedro88, @fabozzi, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
-1 Tested at: c7a34ea The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: AddOn
I found errors in the following addon tests: The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
merge |
Roll back era for early Run 2 heavy-ion relval worflow
As discussed in #19470 the Run 2 heavy-ion reco workflows were migrated to use the Run2_2016 era. Since we didn't use the HI reco in 2016, this doesn't make much sense.
This PR removes Run2_2016 from the era.