New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Skim on NoBPTX primary dataset for EXO (92X) #19522
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @jalimena (Juliette Alimena) for CMSSW_9_2_X. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Skimming @cmsbuild, @kkousour, @davidlange6, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @fabozzi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_9_3_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
Pull request #19522 was updated. @kkousour, @kpedro88, @fabozzi, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
please test workflow 136.735 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_9_3_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
hi all, @davidlange6 , this PR has been sitting around for a week, although I think it should be ready to be merged... just making sure it's not forgotten. thanks! |
@jalimena |
no, we should be all set, @fabozzi |
+1 |
backport of #19521 .
This PR creates a skim on the the NoBPTX dataset for EXO-16-004, EXO-17-004, and HCal DPG noise studies. No event selection criteria are applied, but the event content is greatly reduced from RECO. Furthermore, this skim need only be applied to the NoBPTX dataset, which is already quite small.
The approval talk in the PPD meeting is here: https://indico.cern.ch/event/651440/contributions/2651033/attachments/1489030/2313761/NoBPTXExoSkim_PPDMeeting_6July2017.pdf