New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
option to use deterministic event-based seed in SmearedJetProducer (for MT) [92X] #20259
option to use deterministic event-based seed in SmearedJetProducer (for MT) [92X] #20259
Conversation
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for CMSSW_9_2_X. It involves the following packages: PhysicsTools/PatUtils @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @monttj, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ | |||
variation = cms.int32(0), # If not specified, default to 0 | |||
|
|||
seed = cms.uint32(37428479), # If not specified, default to 37428479 | |||
useDeterministicSeed = cms.bool(True), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
technically, default behavior should not be changed in the production release.
Although in this case this is somewhat debateable.
Let's keep it "false"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
after some more thought, the requirement for reproducibility of production results wins. So, we should keep it True.
+1 for #20259 b263547
|
merge |
Backport of #20240