New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PixelPhase1 trends by lumiblock for offline #20386
PixelPhase1 trends by lumiblock for offline #20386
Conversation
… while keeping trends by LS in Online.
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @folguera (Santiago Folgueras) for master. It involves the following packages: DQM/Integration @kmaeshima, @cmsbuild, @vanbesien, @vazzolini, @dmitrijus can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+code-checks |
+1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
We've added a switch to produce trends plots by Lumiblock (10LS) for OfflineDQM, while keeping the LS granularity for online.
This supersedes #20205, which can be closed.
This approach, suggested by @fioriNTU, should be simpler than the originally proposed in #20205.