New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Miscellaneous updates to CaloLayer1 DQM services #20465
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks |
A new Pull Request was created by @nsmith- (Nicholas Smith) for master. It involves the following packages: DQM/Integration @kmaeshima, @cmsbuild, @vanbesien, @vazzolini, @dmitrijus can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
@@ -7,4 +7,6 @@ | |||
hcalTPSourceSent = cms.InputTag("hcalDigis"), | |||
fedRawDataLabel = cms.InputTag("rawDataCollector"), | |||
histFolder = cms.string('L1T/L1TStage2CaloLayer1'), | |||
# HF minBias bit is not yet unpacked on HCAL side, so we don't compare them |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI @christopheralanwest here is where you can enable comparing the HF feature bit 2 when it is available from the HCAL unpacker
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The HF feature bit 2 is currently not available because of a uHTR FW bug, not a problem in the unpacker. Updated FW that includes a fix for this problem became available just yesterday, and is currently being tested. If the updated FW works as intended, this flag will become obsolete.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great news!
This is all ready to be merged so lets just put that in a new PR.
-1 |
@fabiocos @davidlange6 can this PR finally be merged? |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
Passed the test again. |
+1 |
Thanks. |
Forward-port of #20464